On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > "Josh England" <jjengla@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Looking at the index struct, it already has fields in it for file mode > > uid and gid (woohoo!). > > I can see that storing textual names in gitattributes and having > the root user run git so that it can chown(), would work. Well, the nice thing is that even non-root can actually resolve merge conflicts and generally use the archive, even if non-root obviously cannot then actually set the files to those users/groups! So handling ownership outside of the actual filesystem, in a separate file that git tracks, actually allows you to do things that you couldn't otherwise sanely do. It obviously does have downsides: > But this is only about checkout. After you chown a file in the > work tree and run update-index, next write-tree would not record > it, as there is no place in tree objects to record uid/gid. This is a direct consequence of allowing non-root to actually work with such a repository: the git-tracked ownership information simply is separate, and "git update-index" and friends will never do anything about it, since they just can't rely on the *filesystem* user/group information anyway (because normal users would never be allowed to set it, anyway). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
