"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This is a restart on the topic previously submitted [1] but dropped because > ak/corrected-commit-date was still in progress. This version is based on > that branch. I've read the topic through, and found it a pleasant read. There are some questionable use of integer types, some uneven application of casts, and the reading side API is somewhat underdocumented, but the overall direction looked quite sane. I am undecided if I should expect a reroll, or declare what we have "already good enough" for 'next' and expect incremental refinements, though. A reroll that catches all nits would certainly make the resulting topic's history nicer for future developers to work with, but its also a pain to re-read essentially the same patches again, so...
