Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > There's a bug here where now different things are dispatched to either > the -S or -G codepath wrongly, I've fixed it in my local version. > > Anyway, it's interesting between this and the -U0 change that we have > little/no coverage for some/all of this. I'm trying to address that in > preceding patches in v2. Back when I did the original -S<fixed>, we weren't as focused on good test coverage as we are now. We may have added a lot more by the time when we introduced -G and -S<regexp>, but your effort that resulted in noticing the lack of basic coverage and rectifying the situation is very much appreciated. Thanks.
