Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] t3437: test script for fixup [-C|-c] options in interactive rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:47 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/02/2021 02:01, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > Are the timestamps of these commits meaningful in this context?
>
> I think we want to ensure that the timestamp of the commits created with
> the different author are different from the previous commits. We ought
> to be checking that the author date of the rebased commit matches the
> author date of the original commit and not the author date of the fixup
> commit created with the different author.

Such date-checking would indeed make sense and would remove any
potential confusion a reader might have concerning the manual
test_tick() calls. (It's not super important, but I still lean toward
dropping the test_tick() calls until they are actually needed simply
to avoid confusing readers. I asked about it in my review since their
purpose was unclear and I was genuinely wondering if I was overlooking
the reason for their presence. Future readers of the code may
experience the same puzzlement without necessarily having ready access
to the original author of the code from whom to receive an answer.)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux