Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] doc hash-function-transition: use SHA-1 and SHA-256 consistently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Thomas Ackermann via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Use SHA-1 and SHA-256 instead of sha1 and sha256  when referring
> to the hash type.

Ahh.  [1/6] was supposed to be only about formatting, and I found it
a bit irritating that it had some of these changes mixed in, as it
was not entirely clear to me that [1/6] covered all those lowercase
sha1 and sha256 instances, or just some of them.

Moving them from [1/6] to this step would help future readers by
reducing such irritation (I do not know if it is worth it until
I read through the series to the end).

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../technical/hash-function-transition.txt    | 122 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux