On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:38:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Oops. Looks like I was the one who introduced that. Nobody seems to have > > complained, so I'm somewhat tempted to leave it. But it would not be too > > hard to replace with perl, I think. > > Yeah, but would it be worth it? I am actually OK to say that you > need GNU sed if you want to run perf. We already rely on GNU time > to run perf tests, no? True. This one is a little worse because it's subtle, and somebody might copy it unknowingly into the regular test suite. I am happy to leave it, or for you to pick up the patch I sent earlier (which I did verify produces identical output). -Peff
