On 1/28/2021 1:12 AM, Jeff King wrote: > All of our callers have an object_id, and are just dereferencing the > hash field to pass to us. Let's take the actual object_id instead. We > still access the hash to pass to hash_pos, but it's a step in the right > direction. > > This makes the callers slightly simpler, but also gets rid of the > untyped pointer, as well as the now-inaccurate name "sha1". > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> > --- > I think this one is an obvious cleanup that we'd want whether we go > further in the series or not. I agree. Thanks, -Stolee
