Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:28:14AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: Curiously, the reference of the message points at the cover letter of this series, and there is no mention of a message from early last December. I think this is good. These "conflict IDs" are not even object names, so it would be strange to use "struct object_id" for them (for that matter, packfile ids are not object names, either, but I suspect we might use object_id there). If there were a patch that can readily applied ;-)
