Re: confused about preserved permissions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



martin f krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> also sprach Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> [2007.08.23.0009 +0200]:
>> We deliberately chose not to use that space, and this default is
>> very unlikely to change.
>
> The downsides included change in SHA hash on mode change, as far as
> I can remember. Anything else?

The modes are recorded in patches and push/pull, so if you have
several people working with different permissions/umasks, you get
wagonloads of unnecessary patches and get your local permissions
messed up by other contributors.

For colloborative work, you _really_ don't want to have _personal_
preferences distributed.

Any patch offering to optionally track permissions must make very sure
that it retains the possibility to have permissions in the directory
policed to the values that are actually a property of the source files
rather than the personal work environment.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux