Hi, El mar, 26 ene 2021 a las 19:32, Junio C Hamano (<gitster@xxxxxxxxx>) escribió: > > "Miriam R." <mirucam@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Although I compiled and did small test on the above code snippet, don't > >> trust it blindly and perform your own test and judge whether this is the > >> best way to implement this shortcoming. > > Ok, thank you. > > I am not the original author of this subcommand reimplementation > > and I don't know if there is a reason for the difference with the > > error message. Maybe we can wait for some other reviewers opinion. > > Sorry I missed this thread. > > My understanding is that this topic is an attempt to "reimplement" > what is there in the scripted version, so any deviation of behaviour > obserbable from outside, which is *not* justified, should by > definition be treated as a bug. > > If the original author did not explain why the behaviour difference > exists and defend why the new behaviour in the reimplementation is > better, and if you do not think of a good reason why the behaviour > should be different and the new behaviour is better, then let's > treat it in a bug and fix it. > Ok, I will send another patch series adding this. Thank you. Miriam. > Thanks.
