On 2021-01-24 at 17:57:13, Jason Pyeron wrote: > $ gpg --recv-keys 96AFE6CB > gpg: requesting key 96AFE6CB from hkp server keys.gnupg.net > gpg: key 713660A7: "Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>" 59 new signatures > gpg: key 713660A7: "Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>" 2 new subkeys > gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found > gpg: Total number processed: 1 > gpg: new subkeys: 2 > gpg: new signatures: 59 > > $ gpg --verify -v git-2.30.0.tar.sign git-2.30.0.tar.gz > gpg: Signature made Mon Dec 28 01:12:30 2020 EST using RSA key ID 96AFE6CB > gpg: NOTE: signature key 96AFE6CB expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:24 2020 EDT > gpg: NOTE: signature key B3F7CAC9 expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:42 2020 EDT > gpg: using subkey 96AFE6CB instead of primary key 713660A7 > gpg: NOTE: signature key 96AFE6CB expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:24 2020 EDT > gpg: NOTE: signature key 96AFE6CB expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:24 2020 EDT > gpg: NOTE: signature key B3F7CAC9 expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:42 2020 EDT > gpg: using PGP trust model > gpg: BAD signature from "Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>" > gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA256 The signature is bad because it's over the uncompressed .tar, not the .tar.gz. There is also a .tar.xz and the signature is the same. You therefore need to uncompress it first with gunzip. > $ gpg --list-keys -v 96AFE6CB > gpg: using PGP trust model > gpg: NOTE: signature key 96AFE6CB expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:24 2020 EDT > gpg: NOTE: signature key B3F7CAC9 expired Sun Jul 26 13:41:42 2020 EDT > pub 4096R/713660A7 2011-10-01 > uid Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> > uid Junio C Hamano <junio@xxxxxxxxx> > uid Junio C Hamano <jch@xxxxxxxxxx> > sub 4096R/96AFE6CB 2011-10-03 [expired: 2020-07-26] > sub 4096R/833262C4 2011-10-01 > sub 4096R/B3F7CAC9 2014-09-20 [expired: 2020-07-26] > > It is possible that Junio forgot to push his refreshed public key. Yes, I think that's the case. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Houston, Texas, US
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
