Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Here is a reroll of the series I sent yesterday to traverse the > longest-common prefixes of disjoint sets containing the ref-prefix > arguments to ls-refs. > > Not much has changed last time, except some clarification about what > 'for_each_fullref_in_prefixes()' can yield, and splitting out the last > patch into one from Jacob and one from me. I've forged his sign-off > since it contains his original code, but it includes a new patch > description from me. Oh boy I feel behind, but finally I had managed to block time to read through the two iterations of discussion on this topic without leaving my desk once, and it was a pleasant read. Thank you to all three of you.
