Re: [PATCH] refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:44:43PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>> This has been bugging me for years, and came up again in:
>>
>>   https://lore.kernel.org/git/YAhXw9Gvn5Pyvacq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> so I decided to finally do something about it. There's a minor textual
>> conflict with the caller being touched in that thread, but it's easy to
>> resolve. So I think it's OK to consider the two independent.
>>
>> The commit message turned out rather long. I hope that doesn't scare
>> anybody away, but I wanted to cover all of the bases.
>
> Thanks for all of the detail. Suffice it to say, I was not scared away,
> and am in fact quite comfortable with this direction.
>
> Sorry for sending such a short response to such a long email, but I
> agree with the discussion in the patch message, and I don't have
> anything to add other than my approval and a:
>
>   Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Taylor

Thanks, both.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux