Re: [PATCH] rebase: add a config option for --no-fork-point

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:27 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> By the way, is the feature itself something we can test easily?  I
> think I saw the "we must interact with --root sensibly" test, but
> the actual feature not being tested include
>
>  - rebase.forkpoint set to false and then to true; does it use the
>    fork-point feature (your patch as-is would have failed this test);
>
>  - rebase.forkpoint set to false and command line says --fork-point;
>
>  - rebase.forkpoint set to true and command line says --no-fork-point;
>
> I offhand do not know if it is easy to observe it the fork-point
> feature gets triggered, but it seems that the difference in
> behaviour is big enough for you to care, so I am hoping you may
> think of a way.

This blog post describes the same problem that I had with fork-point:
https://commaok.xyz/post/fork-point/

I didn't see any fork-point tests in the current codebase, but I can
work on adding some. Do you want them in a separate patch (that would
make the most sense to me), or squashed into the rebase.forkPoint
patch?

-Alex



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux