Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] ls_files.c: consolidate two for loops into one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Refactor the two for loops into one,skip showing the ce if it
> has the same name as the previously shown one, only when doing so
> won't lose information.
>
> Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/ls-files.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

This one needs a bit more work, but I like the basic structure of
the rewritten loop.

> diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
> index f1617260064..1454ab1ae6f 100644
> --- a/builtin/ls-files.c
> +++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
> @@ -312,51 +312,39 @@ static void show_files(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir)
>  		if (show_killed)
>  			show_killed_files(repo->index, dir);
>  	}
> -	if (show_cached || show_stage) {
> -		for (i = 0; i < repo->index->cache_nr; i++) {
> -			const struct cache_entry *ce = repo->index->cache[i];
> +	if (! (show_cached || show_stage || show_deleted || show_modified))
> +		return;

If none of these four are given, nothing will be given after this
point, so returning early is good.

> +	for (i = 0; i < repo->index->cache_nr; i++) {
> +		const struct cache_entry *ce = repo->index->cache[i];
> +		struct stat st;
> +		int err;
>  
> +		construct_fullname(&fullname, repo, ce);
>  
> +		if ((dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED) &&
> +			!ce_excluded(dir, repo->index, fullname.buf, ce))
> +			continue;
> +		if (ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE)
> +			continue;

The above two are common between the original two codepaths, and
merging them is good.

> +		if (show_cached || show_stage) {
> +			if (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce))
> +				show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf,
> +					ce_stage(ce) ? tag_unmerged :
> +					(ce_skip_worktree(ce) ? tag_skip_worktree :
> +						tag_cached));
>  		}

We would want to reduce the indentation level of the show_ce() by
consolidating the nested if/if to

		if ((show_cached || show_stage) &&
                    (!show_unmerged || ce_stage(ce)))
			show_ce(...);


Everything below from this point should be skipped (especially, the
call to lstat()) unless show_modified and/or show_deleted was asked
by the caller, i.e.  we want to insert

		if (!(show_deleted || show_modified))
			continue;

here, before we call ce_skip_worktree(), I think.

> +		if (ce_skip_worktree(ce))
> +			continue;
> +		err = lstat(fullname.buf, &st);
> +		if (err) {
> +			if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
> +				error_errno("cannot lstat '%s'", fullname.buf);
> +			if (show_deleted)
> +				show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_removed);
> +			if (show_modified)
>  				show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_modified);
> -		}
> +		} else if (show_modified && ie_modified(repo->index, ce, &st, 0))
> +			show_ce(repo, dir, ce, fullname.buf, tag_modified);
>  	}

And this part would look somewhat different if we take my earlier
suggestion for [1/3].

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux