Hi Charvi
On 19/01/2021 17:13, Charvi Mendiratta wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 20:07, Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
"pick" for the second and subsequent commits with "squash" or "fixup".
If the commits had different authors, the folded commit will be
attributed to the author of the first commit. The suggested commit
-message for the folded commit is the concatenation of the commit
-messages of the first commit and of those with the "squash" command,
-but omits the commit messages of commits with the "fixup" command.
+message for the folded commit is created as follows:
+
+ - It is made using the commit message of a commit with the "fixup -C"
+ or "fixup -c" command. In the later case an editor is opened to edit
+ the commit message.
s/later/latter/
Thanks, will fix it.
What happens if there is more than one "fixup -C/-c" command?
Upon running interactive rebase, in todo list if we use for example sequence of
commands like `fixup -C`, `fixup -C` , `fixup -C` then it will fixup
content of all and
for commit message it will replace with the commit message of end `fixup -C`
Similarly, if we have sequence like `fixup -c`, `fixup -c`, `fixup -c`
then also it will fixup
up all the content and here it allow user to edit the message, so
opens the editor once
It is good that we only open the editor once in this case - I'd not
thought about chains of `fixup -c` before reading this. Do we have a
test to verify that the editor is only opened once?
Best Wishes
Phillip
in this case and shows the commit msg of end `fixup -c` to edit and
also contains
commented commit messages of complete fixup chain. So, for any sequence of fixup
chains `fixup -c` works as similar to the `squash` command.
Hope it explains the working.
Thanks and Regards,
Charvi
