Re: DEVEL: Help with feature implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/18/2021 2:31 PM, Aiyee Bee wrote:
> Hi Antonio and Derrick!
> 
>> I think what you really want is --full-history --simplify-merges [1]. This
>> will show the merges that "fork" the history into parallel tracks where
>> at least two of them contain interesting commits.
> 
> It doesn't look like the implementation of --simplify-merges helps much
> here. That makes its decision on basis of the parents of the commit, which is
> simple to do as it's information attached freely to each commit. I think the
> problem here would be figuring out, given any commit, how many of its children
> are "relevant" commits.

You should definitely give this a try instead of assuming things about the
implementation. The algorithm uses a lot of "simplifying" that makes it look
like the decision is a local one. However, I assure you that is not the case.

Please assemble a test case that demonstrates the behavior you want and how
that is different from what is present in --simplify-merges.

-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux