Re: [PATCH] refs: Always pass old object name to reftx hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:11:28PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:37:21AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> >> > Quick ping on this patch. Is there any interest or shall I just drop it?
> >> 
> >> Apologies for completely dropping this from inbox. I am interested in
> >> it, and the patch looks good to me. I suspect the reason that this never
> >> got queued was that nobody reviewed it.
> >
> > No worries.
> >
> >> Would you consider resubmitting this patch if you are still interested
> >> in pushing it forwards?
> >
> > I can, but does it help to resubmit the same patch? Your response bumped
> > the thread up to the top anyway.
> 
> Bumping without resending would often not help people to see the
> patch at all.
> 
> For example, already-read-and-old messages are not even shown to me
> unless I ask my newsreader "I told you to show only the latest 200
> messages, and I see this recent 'bump' message, but it responds to a
> way old message so you need to show me the latest 3000 messages to
> cover that era in order to see the patch message(s) it bumps."

Fair point, I'll resend the patch. Thanks!

Patrick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux