Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Earlier, I thought to implement the UI of amend! commit as :
> "git commit --fixup=a/amend:<commit>"
>
> So users can either use 'a' as abbreviation or 'amend'. But I want to once
> confirm if I got this right ? As I am doubtful about, what does allowing to
> accept any prefix of "amend" and "reword" means ?
It means that all of these do the same thing ...
git commit --fixup=amend:<commit>
git commit --fixup=amen:<commit>
git commit --fixup=ame:<commit>
git commit --fixup=am:<commit>
git commit --fixup=a:<commit>
... until somebody more brilliant than either of us comes along and
invents another operation that sits next to 'amend' and 'reword',
say, 'annoy'. At that point,
git commit --fixup=a:<commit>
no longer uniquely identifies a choice among three ('amend',
'annoy', or 'reword') and you'd give an error message, but
git commit --fixup=am:<commit>
will keep working as an abbreviation for "amend".
