Re: [PATCH] ci/install-depends: attempt to fix "brew cask" stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:07:38PM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:00 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > -     brew cask install --no-quarantine perforce || {
> > > +     brew install --cask --no-quarantine perforce || {
> >
> > On a related note, it feels like perforce is a frequent offender for
> > triggering spurious failures (both for homebrew setup, but I have
> > definitely seen racy/flaky failures from it as well). I am tempted to
> > say it is not worth the trouble, but then I do not care at all about
> > git-p4 myself in the first place, so I may be biased.
> 
> To be fair to 'perforce', though, the fault of this particular problem
> is Homebrew, which doesn't seem to be all that concerned about
> backward compatibility, at least in my experience. The single
> Homebrew-related automation script I wrote for personal use has been
> broken by arbitrary Homebrew changes frustratingly often over the last
> three years.

Yeah, sorry, I should have been more precise in my language. None of
this is perforce's fault at all. It is homebrew in this case, and in the
racy cases it is probably our tests. But I do not feel like trying to
debug those races for a tool I don't care much about.

I tried to dig up some failing logs as an example, but it's actually a
bit hard to search for, and it looks like logs get expired after a few
months anyway.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux