Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks for dealing with this fallout. Sorry for the mixup. > >> Helped-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Would it be appropriate to convert this to a Co-authored-by? Or more like "Inspired-by-a-patch-by". Also you three have about the same amount of input and deserve credit. Sorry, but it already is on 'next', which will be discarded in a few months when the new cycle begins, so I am not sure if it is worth reverting and reapplying with updated credit trailers. FWIW, I ended up redoing the merge and did "checkout -m" to recreate conflicts, and then looked for "config.*pwd" in the block of text that came from the "part-4" topic and fixed them up manually. I then compared the result of this new merge with the earlier merge that had the issue. The resulting diff is what went into the patch you are responding to. It is good that we had Emily's input as a comparison material to see that both of us independently touched the same places to fix. By the way, the merge into 'master' will directly reuse the conflict resolution of e47c3632 (Merge branch 'ds/maintenance-part-4' into jch, 2021-01-14) from the rerere database, without any separate "merge fix" commit. Thanks.
