On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:26 AM Charvi Mendiratta <charvi077@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -1740,34 +1746,177 @@ static const char first_commit_msg_str[] =
> N_("This is the 1st commit message:");
> static const char nth_commit_msg_fmt[] =
> N_("This is the commit message #%d:");
> +static const char skip_first_commit_msg_str[] =
> +N_("The 1st commit message will be skipped:");
> static const char skip_nth_commit_msg_fmt[] =
> N_("The commit message #%d will be skipped:");
> static const char combined_commit_msg_str[] =
> N_("This is a combination of %d commits.");
[...]
> +static void update_comment_bufs(struct strbuf *buf1, struct strbuf *buf2, int n)
> +{
> + strbuf_setlen(buf1, 2);
> + strbuf_addf(buf1, nth_commit_msg_fmt, n);
Should "_(...)" be used around "nth_commit_msg_fmt" here...
> + strbuf_addch(buf1, '\n');
> + strbuf_setlen(buf2, 2);
> + strbuf_addf(buf2, skip_nth_commit_msg_fmt, n);
...and around "skip_nth_commit_msg_fmt" here?
> + strbuf_addch(buf2, '\n');
> +}
