Re: [PATCH 13/20] packed_object_info(): convert to new revindex API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:11:59AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> >   - Add an additional guard to check that the offset 'obj_offset()'
> >     points to a real object. This should be the case with well-behaved
> >     callers to 'packed_object_info()', but isn't guarenteed.
> >
> >     Other blocks that fill in various other values from the 'struct
> >     object_info' request handle bad inputs by setting the type to
> >     'OBJ_BAD' and jumping to 'out'. Do the same when given a bad offset
> >     here.
>
> Also good. I wonder if we need to call error() here, too. The caller
> will probably say something like "bad object" or whatever, but the user
> will have no clue that it's related to the revindex.
>
> That would match other parts of the function (e.g., calling into
> unpack_entry() can generate lots of descriptive errors about exactly
> what went wrong).

Indeed, and we have the object's offset and pack name to include, too,
so our error can be quite descriptive.

> Yep. Again, I'm really happy to see these "should never happen" cases
> converted to real errors or even BUG()s.

:-).

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux