Re: [RFC] git-mergetool: show original branch names when possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:59:43PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
>
>> >   1. It does not handle pulls which have no tracking branch (the only
>> >      ref we have is FETCH_HEAD, which is not a useful name :) ).
>> 
>> If there's no useful name, than it's probably hard to do anything at all
>> about it. Though FETCH_HEAD is not all that useless -- it at least says it is
>> that that you pull.
>
> But there _is_ a useful name, it's just not a ref (it's the information
> from FETCH_HEAD "branch 'foo' of git://..."). In this case,
> git-mergetool could pull it out of FETCH_HEAD, as well, but I feel like
> we're starting to make a lot of fragile cross-tool assumptions.

Isn't the label "FETCH_HEAD" itself clear enough, without even
looking at it to see which commit it is?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux