Simon Ruderich <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:36:52AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> [snip] >> >> +void git_config_push_env(const char *spec) >> +{ >> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; >> + const char *env_name; >> + const char *env_value; >> + >> + env_name = strrchr(spec, '='); >> + if (!env_name) >> + die("invalid config format: %s", spec); >> + env_name++; >> + >> + env_value = getenv(env_name); >> + if (!env_value) >> + die("config variable missing for '%s'", env_name); > > I think "environment variable" should be mentioned in the error > message to make it clear what kind of "variable" is missing. Good observation. This parses foo=bar and complains about bar missing in the environment; It is not a "config variable" that is missing. It is "'bar', which is supposed to be there whose value is going to be used as the value of configuration variable 'foo', is missing." I wonder if we should also talk about 'foo' at the same time as a hint for what went wrong? E.g. die(_("missing environment variable '%s' for configuration '%.*s'"), env_name, (int)((env_name-1) - spec), spec); I don't offhand know if that is too much info that may not be all that useful, though. > Btw. shouldn't these strings get translated (or does die() do > that automatically)? The format string given to die/error/warn should be marked with _(). Thanks.