[PATCH v2] SubmittingPatches: tighten wording on "sign-off" procedure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The text says "if you can certify DCO then you add a Signed-off-by
trailer".  But it does not say anything about people who cannot or
do not want to certify.  A natural reading may be that if you do not
certify, you must not add the trailer, but it shouldn't hurt to be
overly explicit.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index d12094bac5..0452db2e67 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ wrote the patch or have the right to pass it on under the same license
 as ours, by "signing off" your patch.  Without sign-off, we cannot
 accept your patches.
 
-If you can certify the below D-C-O:
+If (and only if) you certify the below D-C-O:
 
 [[dco]]
 .Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
-- 
2.30.0-274-g31e3a2ed96




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux