Re: git-stash segfaults ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 11:54:24PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I think you were told that your patch was a band-aid for the
> symptom, and was not the real fix, in the thread you quoted.

To which I responded that it is still better to report an error than it
is to segfault. In this case, the error message _isn't_ fixing the main
problem, but at least it gives a better starting point for tracking
problems than a segfault.  Not to mention that it _does_ provide the
correct error message in a variety of other situations (e.g.,
merge-recursive given bogus arguments).

But really, merge-recursive isn't generally called by users, and so it
shouldn't get bogus input, so perhaps it isn't worth caring about.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux