Re: Centralized processes in git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steven Grimm wrote:
the repository-altering commands would grab a shared lock.

I guess that's a bit confusing -- what I mean to say is that the repository-altering commands that today do not lock the repository would grab a shared lock such that, in the absence of something else grabbing the exclusive lock, they will continue to effectively not lock the repository. IOW, by grabbing the shared lock they will continue to exhibit their current behavior under normal conditions.

-Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux