Re: git-dir requires work-tree; documentation improvements for working directory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yaroslav Nikitenko wrote:
> However, I think that this is a bug in the implementation or the
> documentation. It's not highlighted anywhere that the repository must
> be non-bare for git-dir to work without explicit work-tree (an
> opposite is stated in general).

core.bare=true means no work-tree, so to me that behavior follows from
the documentation. But others might disagree.

> Should I write a letter with [BUG] in its header for that to be noticed?

The mailing list is a little more quite than usual, probably due to the
holidays.

If nobody else responds in a week, try again.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux