On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:40:52PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Josef Sipek wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:24:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > > > > Continuing on with kernel archeology for embedded systems, any > > > > interest in making a git tree with all of the kernel versions from the > > > > beginning up to the start of the current git tree? > > > > > > I just put the archive I've gathered so far in a Git tree on kernel.org: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nico/archive.git > > > > > > It is also available through gitweb from: > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nico/archive.git > > > > I don't mean to nit-pick but, would it be possible to have the timestamps > > for the commits closer to the release dates? > > Well, the author timestamp already is, based on the date of the > announcement message used for the commit log, including the timezone. > If you find errors in those please tell me. Ah ok. Too bad gitweb displays the commit times => throws off some of the sorting too. /me prods gitweb people > The commit timestamp, however, is the time when _I_ created the > repository, hence it should not be that interesting. Too bad that's the date you see all over the place :( Jeff. -- NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
