On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 02:40:15PM -0800, Emily Shaffer wrote: > > By showing the list of all hooks in 'git help hook' for users to refer > to, 'git help hook' becomes a one-stop shop for hook authorship. Since > some may still have muscle memory for 'git help githooks', though, > reference the 'git hook' commands and otherwise don't remove content. > > Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Sorry for the wonky subject. It seemed unnecessary to send the entirety > of the topic again when there were no changes. (I was able to push this > patch to my fork without -f, so indeed the rest is unchanged.) > > I'd really prefer if 'git help githooks' opens the 'git-hook.txt' manpage, > but I couldn't figure out how to do that. This seemed like the next best thing > to me - users can still find information at the old manpage, but get a little > nudge towards the new manpage in case they didn't notice it. > > Extremely open to other notes about the direction of these docs; I'm not > confident in anything except that it'd be annoying to have 'git help > githooks' remain unchanged. Even now, this is missing the native-hooks.txt from the commit. Ugh. This commit breaks the build; please do not add it to the topic. I will include a fixed version with the next reroll. Sorry. That said, the intent is clear enough for me to still feel comfortable inviting review. - Emily
