Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mergetool: add automerge configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Felipe

On 18/12/2020 12:49, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't make sense to display lines without conflicts in the
different views of all mergetools.

Only the lines that warrant conflict markers should be displayed.

Most people would want this behavior on, but in case some don't; add a
new configuration: mergetool.autoMerge.

See Seth House's blog post [1] for the idea, and the rationale.

[1] https://www.eseth.org/2020/mergetools.html

I would be good to have a summary of the idea in this commit message so people do not have to go and find a blog post which may well disappear in the future

Original-idea-by: Seth House <seth@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/config/mergetool.txt |  3 +++
  git-mergetool.sh                   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  t/t7610-mergetool.sh               | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/config/mergetool.txt b/Documentation/config/mergetool.txt
index 16a27443a3..7ce6d0d3ac 100644
--- a/Documentation/config/mergetool.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config/mergetool.txt
@@ -61,3 +61,6 @@ mergetool.writeToTemp::
mergetool.prompt::
  	Prompt before each invocation of the merge resolution program.
+
+mergetool.autoMerge::
+	Remove lines without conflicts from all the files. Defaults to `true`.
diff --git a/git-mergetool.sh b/git-mergetool.sh
index e3f6d543fb..f4db0cac8d 100755
--- a/git-mergetool.sh
+++ b/git-mergetool.sh
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ checkout_staged_file () {
  	fi
  }
+auto_merge () {
+	git merge-file --diff3 --marker-size=7 -q -p "$LOCAL" "$BASE" "$REMOTE" >"$DIFF3"

I've been wondering if we want to recreate the merge or just get the merged BASE LOCAL and REMOTE from the merged file in the working tree. If the user wants to resolve the conflicts in stages, or opens the file in a editor and fixes some conflicts and then realizes they want to use a merge tool that work is thrown away if we recreate the merge. They can always use `checkout --merge` to throw away their changes and start again with a mergetool. It would mean checking the size of the conflict markers and using '/^<{$conflict_marker_size}/,^|{$conflict_marker_size}/' for sed. Getting the merged BASE would be tricky if the user does not have diff3 conflicts enabled, I'm not sure if we can safely get BASE from `git merge-file ...` and LOCAL and REMOTE from the working tree.

+	if test -s "$DIFF3"
+	then
+		sed -e '/^<<<<<<< /,/^||||||| /d' -e '/^=======\r\?$/,/^>>>>>>> /d' "$DIFF3" >"$BASE"
+		sed -e '/^||||||| /,/^>>>>>>> /d' -e '/^<<<<<<< /d' "$DIFF3" >"$LOCAL"
+		sed -e '/^<<<<<<< /,/^=======\r\?$/d' -e '/^>>>>>>> /d' "$DIFF3" >"$REMOTE"
+	fi
+	rm -- "$DIFF3"
+}
+
  merge_file () {
  	MERGED="$1"
@@ -274,6 +285,7 @@ merge_file () {
  		BASE=${BASE##*/}
  	fi
+ DIFF3="$MERGETOOL_TMPDIR/${BASE}_DIFF3_$$$ext"
  	BACKUP="$MERGETOOL_TMPDIR/${BASE}_BACKUP_$$$ext"
  	LOCAL="$MERGETOOL_TMPDIR/${BASE}_LOCAL_$$$ext"
  	REMOTE="$MERGETOOL_TMPDIR/${BASE}_REMOTE_$$$ext"
@@ -322,6 +334,11 @@ merge_file () {
  	checkout_staged_file 2 "$MERGED" "$LOCAL"
  	checkout_staged_file 3 "$MERGED" "$REMOTE"
+ if test "$(git config --bool mergetool.autoMerge)" != "false"

If I run `git config --bool mergetool.autoMerge` it returns an empty string so I think you need to test it is actually equal to "true".

I also share the view that this should be per tool. Your demand that someone comes up with an example that breaks assumes that we have access to all the tools that users are using. Seth has done a great job of surveying the popular tools but given the size of git's user-base and the diversity of uses it is very likely that there will be people using in-house or proprietary tools that no one on the list has access to. I would much prefer to avoid breaking them rather than waiting for a bug report before implementing a per-tool setting. It is quite possible people are using different tools for different files in the same way as they use different merge drivers for different files and want the setting disabled for a tool that does semantic merging but enabled textual merges.

Best Wishes

Phillip

+	then
+		auto_merge
+	fi
+
  	if test -z "$local_mode" || test -z "$remote_mode"
  	then
  		echo "Deleted merge conflict for '$MERGED':"
diff --git a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh
index 70afdd06fa..ccabd04823 100755
--- a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh
+++ b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh
@@ -828,4 +828,22 @@ test_expect_success 'mergetool -Oorder-file is honored' '
  	test_cmp expect actual
  '
+test_expect_success 'mergetool automerge' '
+	test_config mergetool.automerge true &&
+	test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
+	git checkout -b test${test_count}_b master &&
+	test_write_lines >file1 base "" a &&
+	git commit -a -m "base" &&
+	test_write_lines >file1 base "" c &&
+	git commit -a -m "remote update" &&
+	git checkout -b test${test_count}_a HEAD~ &&
+	test_write_lines >file1 local "" b &&
+	git commit -a -m "local update" &&
+	test_must_fail git merge test${test_count}_b &&
+	yes "" | git mergetool file1 &&
+	test_write_lines >expect local "" c &&
+	test_cmp expect file1 &&
+	git commit -m "test resolved with mergetool"
+'
+
  test_done





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux