Re: [PATCH v2 23/33] diff-merges: fix style of functions definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren wrote:
> Personally, I think that a really important point to keep in mind when
> submitting patch series is trying to figure out the easiest way to
> move the code from point A to point B, not the route you took to get
> from point A to point B.  This is especially true for longer patch
> series.  It's common after you've finished a series to discover there
> was an easier or cleaner route to follow that would have arrived at
> the same end-point.  It's not uncommon for me to spend a significant
> chunk of time rebasing and restructuring a patch series to try to
> highlight such a better path.  This includes not just style fixups,
> but different patch orderings, alternate ways to break up functions,
> using different data structures, etc.

Me as well.

It's extra work for one person, but everyone else benefits, including
that one person in the future (who usually forgets why he/she did things
in that particular way).

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux