Seth House <seth@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wasn't aware of this plubming when I wrote the initial shell-script > version of the technique. This is a much better approach (even *if* > there's a negligible performance penalty). This nicely avoids > UNIX/Windows line-ending surprises, and instead leans on > already-configured Git defaults for those. Plus the non-text files > benefit you mentioned is also huge. > >> as I understand "mergetool" is handed an >> already conflicted state and asked to resolve it, it would not be >> possible without at least looking at the stage #1 to recover the >> base for folks who do not use diff3 style. > > I feel strongly that LOCAL, REMOTE, and BASE should be left intact for > this reason, Also because they aid readers in understanding the > pre-conflicts versions of the file. Well, good to see that we helped somebody who we do not see regularly around here. You should hang around here more often ;-)
