Re: [PATCH 02/11] merge-ort: add initial outline for basic rename detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Elijah,

On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Elijah Newren wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:42 AM Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Elijah & Stolee,
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/13/2020 2:47 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for two different email responses to the same email...
> > > >
> > > > Addressing the comments on this patchset mean re-submitting
> > > > en/merge-ort-impl, and causing conflicts in en/merge-ort-2 and this
> > > > series en/merge-ort-3.  Since gitgitgadget will not allow me to submit
> > > > patches against a series that isn't published by Junio, I'll need to
> > > > ask Junio to temporarily drop both of these series, then later
> > > > resubmit en/merge-ort-2 after he publishes my updates to
> > > > en/merge-ort-impl.  Then when he publishes my updates to
> > > > en/merge-ort-2, I'll be able to submit my already-rebased patches for
> > > > en/merge-ort-3.
> > >
> > > Let's chat privately about perhaps creatin
> >
> > Yes, I am totally willing to push up temporary branches if that helps you,
> > or even giving you push permissions to do that.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Dscho
>
> Given the amount of changes left to push up, I suspect there'll be
> more cases where it'd be useful.  If I could get push permissions, and
> a suggested namespace to use for such temporary branches, that'd help.

I invited you into the GitGitGadget organization.

Recently, I pushed up `hanwen/libreftable` to have a proper base branch
for myself, but I think that was probably not a good idea. I should have
opened a namespace like `temp/` or some such.

> In this particular case, though, one of my two fears was already
> realized -- Junio jumped in and did the work of rebasing and conflict
> resolving for en/merge-ort-2 and en/merge-ort-3.  I didn't want to
> burden him with that extra work, but what he pushed up for
> en/merge-ort-2 is identical to what I have.  So, all I have to do is
> push en/merge-ort-3 with the extra changes I have in it.  So this
> particular time is taken care of.

Understood.

Thanks,
Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux