Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] pull: refactor fast-forward check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It's much cleaner this way.

It is obvious that a focused single purpose helper with less
indentation is easier to follow both at the calling site and the
implementation itself.

"It's much cleaner" is not something you need to say.

If you were making it uglier, but other benefits outweigh the
ugliness, that may deserve to be said, but that is not the case
here.

> Also, we would like to be able to make this check before the decision to
> rebase is made.

... in a future step.

That is something we want to say upfront, not "Also".

The patch itself looks quite straightforward.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux