Re: [PATCH 2/2] refs: warn on non-pseudoref looking .git/<file> refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 10 2020, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:55 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>> Let's help the user in this case by doing a very loose check for
>> whether the ref name looks like a pseudoref such as "HEAD" (i.e. only
>> has upper case, dashes, underbars), and if not issue a warning:
>> [...]
>> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/Documentation/config/core.txt b/Documentation/config/core.txt
>> @@ -355,6 +355,17 @@ core.warnAmbiguousRefs::
>> +core.warnNonPseudoRefs::
>> +       If true, Git will warn you if the `<ref>` you passed
>> +       unexpectedly resolves to a top-level ref stored in
>> +       `.git/<file>` but doesn't look like a pseudoref such as
>> +       `HEAD`, `MERGE_HEAD` etc. True by default.
>> ++
>> +These references are ignored by linkgit:for-each-ref[1], but resolved
>> +by linkgit:git-show[1], linkgit:git-rev-parse[1] etc. So it can be
>> +confusing to have e.g. an errant `.git/master` being confused with
>> +`.git/refs/heads/master`.
>
> Dscho has been submitting patches lately to eradicate the word
> "master" from the project source.

Muscle memory dies hard, will fix it in the reroll.

>> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
>> @@ -669,6 +676,19 @@ int expand_ref(struct repository *repo, const char *str, int len,
>>                 if (r) {
>> +                       if (warn_non_pseudo_refs &&
>> +                           !starts_with(fullref.buf, "refs/") &&
>> +                           !starts_with(r, "refs/") &&
>> +                           !strchr(r, '/') &&
>> +                           !is_any_pseudoref_syntax(r) &&
>> +                           !warned_on_non_pseudo_ref++) {
>> +                               /*
>> +                                * TRANSLATORS: The 1st argument is
>> +                                * e.g. "master", and the 2nd can be
>> +                                * e.g. "master~10".
>> +                                */
>> +                               warning(_("matched ref name .git/%s doesn't look like a pseudoref"), r);
>
> The TRANSLATORS comment talks about two arguments, but I see only one.
>
> Does the "matched ref name" part add any value? I would find the
> warning just as helpful without it:
>
>     .git/blork doesn't look like a pseudoref

Yeah that's much better, the TRANSLATORS comment is incorrect, rebased
out an earlier version where it took two, didn't notice...

>> diff --git a/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh b/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh
>> @@ -374,4 +374,45 @@ test_expect_success 'branch -m can rename refs/heads/-dash' '
>> +test_expect_success 'warn on non-pseudoref syntax refs in .git/' '
>> +       test_when_finished "
>> +               rm -f .git/mybranch &&
>> +               rm -rf .git/a-dir &&
>> +               rm -rf .git/MY-BRANCH_NAME &&
>> +               rm -rf .git/MY-branch_NAME
>> +       " &&
>
> Nit: These could all be removed with a single `rm -rf`:
>
>     rm -rf .git/mybranch .git/a-dir ...

Will fix.

>> +       # We do not ignore lower-case
>> +       cp expect .git/mybranch &&
>> +       git rev-parse mybranch >hash 2>err &&
>> +       test_cmp expect hash &&
>> +       GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=false grep "like a pseudoref" err &&
>
> What is the purpose of assigning GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON here?

Since 6cdccfce1e0 (i18n: make GETTEXT_POISON a runtime option,
2018-11-08) we haven't needed to use the C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequisite
for any new code, since we can just turn the poisoning off.

I think we should just slowly refactor things away from that
prerequisite and test_i18ngrep, which were only needed because it used
to be a compile-time switch, but I haven't gotter around to that
refactoring.

In liue of that I think it makes more sense to always run the full test
if possible, no matter what the GIT_TEST_* mode is.

>> +       git -c core.warnNonPseudoRefs=false rev-parse mybranch >hash 2>err &&
>> +       test_cmp expect hash &&
>> +       test_must_be_empty err &&
>> +       rm .git/mybranch
>> +'





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux