On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:08 AM Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's not about what I want, it's about what the project wants. And I > think it's pretty clear what the project wants: > > 1. git pull to eventually fail in non-fast-forward cases > 2. A grace period before that switch is flipped > > That's it. > > My proposal is the only one (so far) that gives us that. Not to mention that part I is not even contentious. We can improve the situation of users *today*. -- Felipe Contreras
