Hi Junio, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * js/init-defaultbranch-advice (2020-11-24) 4 commits > - init: provide useful advice about init.defaultBranch > - get_default_branch_name(): prepare for showing some advice > - branch -m: allow renaming a yet-unborn branch > - init: document `init.defaultBranch` better > > Our users are going to be trained to prepare for future change of > init.defaultBranch configuration variable. > > Expecting a reroll. > cf. <xmqq8saqjx2n.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > I think a new advice.defaultBranchName is a bad idea. Unfortunately, this objection is news to me. Why would it be anything but a legitimate interest to say "yeah, whatever, Git, just use the default branch name, I'm fine with it"? Ciao, Dscho