Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Caught a typo here, sending this as a squash patch since it's already in > next: The breakage and the fix looks obvious to me, but... How did CI allow 'next' to pass with such a typo, I wonder? Moreover, my pre-push tests of all the integration branches I didn't notice this to fail, but I cannot see how it could have been succeeded. Puzzled... Will queue, thanks. > > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] t7900: fix typo: "test_execpt_success" > > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > t/t7900-maintenance.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh > index 4ca3617173..8c061197a6 100755 > --- a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh > +++ b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh > @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ test_expect_success 'register preserves existing strategy' ' > test_config maintenance.strategy incremental > ' > > -test_execpt_success 'fails when running outside of a repository' ' > +test_expect_success 'fails when running outside of a repository' ' > nongit test_must_fail git maintenance run && > nongit test_must_fail git maintenance stop && > nongit test_must_fail git maintenance start &&
