Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > would be sad to lose it. (I don't use it with grep, but my standard perl > invocation is "perl -lpe 'some script'"; another common one is "tar xvf > foo.tar"). Heh, "tar" is a different breed, isn't it? It can have a clump of single letter options among which more than one take parameter. > And it works now (obviously not in the case we're discussing, but in > other cases that don't run afoul of the typo fix), so I think people > would see that as a regression. Sure.
