Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Move initialization code related to diffing merges into new > init_diff_merge_revs() function. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > revision.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c > index 739295bb9ff4..bc568fb79778 100644 > --- a/revision.c > +++ b/revision.c > @@ -1805,6 +1805,8 @@ static int add_parents_only(struct rev_info *revs, const char *arg_, int flags, > return 1; > } > > +static void init_diff_merge_revs(struct rev_info *revs); > + It is not wrong per-se, but I do not see why we do not define the function here, not just forward-declare it like so. > void repo_init_revisions(struct repository *r, > struct rev_info *revs, > const char *prefix) > @@ -1813,7 +1815,7 @@ void repo_init_revisions(struct repository *r, > > revs->repo = r; > revs->abbrev = DEFAULT_ABBREV; > - revs->ignore_merges = -1; > + init_diff_merge_revs(revs); > revs->simplify_history = 1; > revs->pruning.repo = r; > revs->pruning.flags.recursive = 1; > @@ -2153,6 +2155,10 @@ static void add_message_grep(struct rev_info *revs, const char *pattern) > add_grep(revs, pattern, GREP_PATTERN_BODY); > } > > +static void init_diff_merge_revs(struct rev_info *revs) { > + revs->ignore_merges = -1; > +} Style. A brace that begins a function body begins its own line. In any case, I'd move this new definition before its sole caller; that way we do not even need an extra forward-declaration. > static int parse_diff_merge_opts(struct rev_info *revs, const char **argv) { > int argcount; > const char *optarg;