Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] reftable: add LICENSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:28 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:26 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Until the reftable code is actually merged into git, I work on the
> > reftable library itself at github.com/google/reftable. I've asked our
> > opensource team if we could switch off the CLA enforcement for this
> > repo, to facilitate back & forth imports of fixes.
>
> I've asked our lawyers, but this is not currently possible, unfortunately.

Maybe I'm not understanding something correctly.

Git's license is GPLv2. When you add your Signed-off-by line you are
saying you are authorized to provide this code to the Git project
under its open source license.

Therefore, I should be able to take your patches, and rework them in
any way I want as long as I keep Git's license.

I don't need your permission, you are supposedly giving it by adding
your Signed-off-by line.

Read: https://developercertificate.org/

If you are not authorized to provide these patches under an open
source license, then you should not add your Signed-off-by line.

And if these patches cannot be used by the Git project, nor can we
work on them in a collaborative manner, then what's the point in
providing them?

Sounds to me Google has not made its mind about actually contributing
these changes.

Or am I missing something?

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux