Re: [PATCH] Fix an unitialized pointer in merge-recursive.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 8/16/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Indeed &mrtree is passed to merge_trees() that not always
>> > seems to set the value, so on some paths mrtree could
>> > return uninitialized.
>> >
>> > Spotted by a gcc 4.2.1 warning
>>
>> Are you sure that gcc is correctly seeing the codeflow?
>>
>> In merge(), mrtree is used only under index_only, and
>> merge_trees() always sets *result under index_only.
>>
>
> Ok ;-)
>
> Now two options:
>
> - discard the patch
>
> - change the title in 'silence a gcc bougus warning'

Third option.  Change the assignment from "mrtree = NULL" to
"mrtree = mtree".  It is a standard idiom to work around stupid
gcc warnings.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux