On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 02:01:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I actually think it would be easier to follow the logic to replace > this pointer with > > size_t common_size; > [ ... ] Yep, much clearer indeed. Thanks. Taylor
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 02:01:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I actually think it would be easier to follow the logic to replace > this pointer with > > size_t common_size; > [ ... ] Yep, much clearer indeed. Thanks. Taylor