Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I took a look at converting some of the existing tests. This seems to > work. It's a bit longer to read, perhaps, but I kind of like that the > expected outcome is all laid out. It also pollutes the test output less > (e.g., if you wanted to count up skipped tests in the whole suite, you'd > get a bunch of noise from t0000 for these uninteresting skips). > > Thoughts? I think this is something I'd do on top of your patch. Yes, it looks nice as the expectation is expressed much clearly.
