Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] parse-remote: remove this now-unused library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 16 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The previous two commits removed the last use of a function in this
>> library, but most of it had been dead code for a while[1][2]. Only the
>> "get_default_remote" function was still being used.
>
> Yup.  ... still being used, but now it is gone.
>
>> Even though we had a manual page for this library it was never
>> intended (or I expect, actually) used outside of git.git. Let's just
>> remove it, if anyone still cares about a function here they can pull
>> them into their own project[3].
>>
>> 1. Last use of error_on_missing_default_upstream():
>>    d03ebd411c ("rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting",
>>    2019-03-18)
>>
>> 2. Last use of get_remote_merge_branch(): 49eb8d39c7 ("Remove
>>    contrib/examples/*", 2018-03-25)
>>
>> 3. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a6vmhdka.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> I am not sure why we even need reference [3] here.  
>
> Isn't it another mailing list article where you express your opinion
> "they can dig our old version and copy it to their project", which
> is the same statement you are making in this proposed log message?
>
> Are we saying "we said the same thing on the list before, which is
> stronger truth than the claim in this proposed log message"?

I was aiming for answering the question of "why didn't he just move it
to contrib/?" by adding an (it seems too much of an indirect) reference
to contrib/examples/, without going into that whole saga again in the
commit message itself.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux