On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 7:00 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12 2020, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > After this series as it stands lands what's a rather big UI change in > git isn't discussed *anywhere* in the docs. > > I'm not saying we need some similar s/master/main/g in Documentation/ as > what's being done here in t/, but I think a bare minimum for a rather > big UI change like this is: Why not? Isn't this change being championed on behalf of users who find the word offensive? Why would it be offensive to see the word on the commands you type on the command line, but not offensive if the documentation tells you to type those commands? This does not compute. And worse; for the rest of the users that don't find the word offensive (99.9% of them?), the documentation is left in an inconsistent state, where some commands would not work as they are stated. If a word is so offensive it has to be erased from the Git lexicon, then it has to be erased *everywhere*, or at least everywhere a user might look. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras
