On 08/15/2007 07:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Rene Herman had an idea about using some git
metadata that might be useful. The completely
external data approach suggested by Al Viro
might be OK too in that it wouldn't tie listeners
to git requiring more content in git metadata.
The reason I found Linus's suggestion desirable is because it
fundamentally does not require git to track any metadata. If
the commits are in git, then his script would let you gather the
data, but otherwise you should be able to do the same by
grepping patches. Obviously you would need to filter by paths,
looking at the diffstat, but the approach does _not_ tie users
to git.
I believe that wouldn't be much of a problem really. Users in this context
are people submitting patches and most people who do will, could and maybe
even should be running git these days -- git is very good, GPLd and the
Linux source code managament system.
But for occasional contributors that don't, a MAINTAINERS file much like the
current could also be generated into releases; it's just that the source
would live as file/directory metadata inside git.
Still like the notion of a generic file/directory metadata implementation
inside git, through that "<tag>=<value>" system that I suggested. Wouldn't
be intrinsically tied to Linux or anything, with any project being free to
invent their own tags and has heaps of possible uses, from the current
MAINTAINERS info, through summary information, author/licese information,
anything goes...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
