Hi all, After submitting a patch internally within our organization today, I was looking through the `format-patch` output and was curious to see the strange timestamp on the "From" line. At first glance I thought the parent commit timestamp might have been off, but that wasn't the case. I thought it might be a bug but quickly noticed the fixed timestamp string in `log-tree`. Reading through the various revisions of `log-tree.c` didn't answer many questions either, until I turned to the docs and read: > The patch produced by git format-patch is in UNIX mailbox format, with a fixed "magic" time stamp to indicate that the file is output from format-patch rather than a real mailbox [...] I find this pretty interesting, and would like to hear more from those that introduced change. It looks like this was first introduced in 3eefc18917 (Tentative built-in format-patch., 2006-04-18), albeit with a different "magic" timestamp, and then changed to its current timestamp value in 698ce6f87e (fmt-patch: Support --attach, 2006-05-20). Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming the "UNIX mailbox format" referenced in the docs refers to the mbox database format described in appendix A of RFC-4155. If so, since we use a commit id in place of the sender email address, would that itself be sufficient to indicate that the output isn't from a real mailbox? A commit id will never match the addr-spec in RFC-2822, so I figure that anyone looking at `format-patch` output could safely assume that it did not originate from a mailbox. I could see this as a good opportunity to use a more relevant timestamp, perhaps the commit timestamp of the first patch in the series.